RSPCA POLICY NOT TO ACCEPT ABANDONED PETS

HOW THE RSPCA DEAL WITH LOST PETS

WHAT THE RSPCA DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW

Friday, 14 November 2008

WE CHALLENGE CPS TO SCRUTINISE RSPCA PROSECUTIONS

HOW MANY RSPCA PROSECUTIONS ARE UNSAFE ?


In the wake of the BBC Inside out Exposure of RSPCA prosecutions travesties Animal Owners Against Persecution joins SHG and challenges the Crown Prosecution Service to Review every single RSPCA prosecution after several RSPCA prosecutions collapse following evidence of witness coaching, RSPCA expert veterinary evidence described as ‘unsafe’ or prosecutions are overturned at appeal.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00fj230/?src=a_syn31

Recent RSPCA prosecutions have collapsed following admissions by the RSPCA that they:
• Routinely hold case conferences involving lay and expert witnesses,
• Effectively ‘coach’ veterinary experts with the use of an extremely negatively worded pro-forma document

During trials: District Judge Grey at Harwich Magistrates Court expressed “grave concerns” about what had happened, Magistrates at Portsmouth Magistrates Court were highly critical of the RSPCA’s conduct and methods of investigation,

The Chairman of the Magistrates, Mr. Jim Morrison, stated that the RSPCA should change their practices in future, Magistrates made serious criticisms of RSPCA Inspector Janet Edwards’ failure to explain what offences were being investigated.

Magistrates Chairman, Mr. Jim Morrison, stressed that in future the legislation must be explained to suspects and the RSPCA must tell them they have a right to have their own solicitor present during an interview.

The RSPCA must not imply any adverse inference will be drawn if there is an adjournment for this reason,The revelations did not become known until the trial was under way because the RSPCA’s solicitors: Steadfastly refused to disclose relevant documents to which the Defence were entitled.
Ernest Vine of the SHG said “We have seen transcripts of RSPCA conferences from other cases, so this is not an isolated incident. In fact we have one transcript from as long ago as 1999.

This should raise alarm bells with all of the relevant authorities about the safety of every previous RSPCA conviction. Indeed, it is likely that many people have erroneously pleaded guilty on the basis of the RSPCA prosecution veterinary reports alone.

”“The SHG has been campaigning for the CPS to use their powers to quality control RSPCA prosecutions for some time and we wonder how much public money donated for animal welfare, and how much court time is going to continue to be wasted before the RSPCA is brought under the control of the laws that apply to everyone else in this country.”Anne Kasica of the SHG concluded: “We told the government that proper protections for the public were needed in the Animal Welfare Act 2006 during the consultation exercise.

We warned them that such abuses of the human and civil rights of animal owners would be inevitable if they failed to implement such protections.”How many innocent people are going to be convicted, or put through the agonies of a highly public prosecution that fails, because the RSPCA is out of control and the relevant authorities are doing nothing to protect the public ?”

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The BBC film suggested that the RSPCA is politically motivated and in effect a private police force. Also that it uses its prosecutions as great publicity to generate funds, though in many cases, they were inappropriate and a complete waste of time and money, let alone causing huge damage to the people involved.

Gordon Brown said...

shows this lot for what they really are, animal rights nutters who dont give a hoot for people, they are more interested in stiching up innocent farmers or pet keepers to make themselves lots of money to buy big fancy headoffices with. what an arrogant person that case is, wouldn acknowledge they are wrong at all

Animal Owners Against Persecution said...

ROLL ON JUDICIAL REVIEW